<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest topics for the forum "Urban Development"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/forums/show/21.html</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The newest discussed topics in the forum "Urban Development"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Re: City's Biggest Projects Escape Scrutiny</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Op-Ed: <b>City's Biggest Projects Escape Scrutiny</b>
Posted 10/Jun/2008 21:45:00 by Slavito

In writing about UQAM's Îlot Voyageur debacle, Henri Aubin (The Gazette) makes a much bigger point: why is it that in Montréal, the largest projects seem to escape the careful analysis and public scrutiny that are the norm for smaller ones?

Continue reading: » City's Biggest Projects Escape Scrutiny:

http://www.montrealbits.com/2008/biggest_projects_escape_scrutiny.html
]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/161.html</guid>
				<link>http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/161.html</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:44:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ slavito]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Giant hole at St-Antoine Ouest</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Can somebody finally explain when the giant hole on St-Antoine and St-Pierre is going to start getting filled with anything ? I think it's been more than a year...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/136.html</guid>
				<link>http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/136.html</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:03:19]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ lexthegreat]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Parc / des Pins - now what do we do?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The "intersection" question comes up again or, rather the question of what to do with the empty space:

<blockquote>
    ... there’s a more controversial parcel of land south of Pine Avenue. A small part of it is a triangle that stretches west along Pine to Durocher Street; the rest is a square at the southeast corner of Pine and Park. All in all, the land in question covers about 5,000 square metres.  
&nbsp;
		</blockquote>


http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/category/cities/montreal/

As far as I'm concerned, whatever they do, they should NOT repeat the horror of a similarly shaped triangle at Canal Street and West Broadway in New York. There, after a long consideration, they built an ugly-ass 1-story retail structure filled with strobe lights and other crap.
]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/130.html</guid>
				<link>http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/130.html</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Jul 2007 01:17:35]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ slavito]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Razing the Spectrum, etc</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ A passionate post on MTL city weblog:

http://w5.montreal.com/mtlweblog/2007/06/rogers-has-eye-on-balmoral.html

I generally agree with the opinion expressed there and share the concerns (certainly I won't be looking forward to seeing a giant BestBuy on St-Catherine), but here's what irked me:

<blockquote>All the small businesses shown above will be erased when the Spectrum is razed. Instead we'll have a featureless glass wall. Is this meant to be beneficial and to attract people to the area?&nbsp;
		</blockquote>

There's a photo supplied with the post to make us all feel sorry for the business. I've got to say it straight out loud: this is the most fucking disgusting block in downtown Montreal and those businesses should be razed to the ground no matter what.

A ridiculous porn store, a couple of no-name restaurants, an empty parking lot and a diner on the corner that hasn't gotten around to replace windows that cracked YEARS ago (instead putting a duct tape of on top of the cracks) elicit absolutely no nostalgia in me. It's fucking ugly and I won't miss any of that. Status quo is NOT a good option.

What do you guys think?

P.S. The corner in question is St-Catherine & De Bleury
]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/123.html</guid>
				<link>http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/123.html</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:59:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ slavito]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>St-Laurent renovation</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I always wondered "what exactly are they doing on St-Laurent?". Seems like I found the answer in a year-old article:

http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/montreal/story.html?id=4a85b679-cb4e-4d44-9602-72de573d6e6a

<blockquote>all the sidewalks will bewidened by 75 centimetres. About 100 historical markers will beembedded in the 1,430 metres of widened sidewalks to line the lowerMain's east and west flanks.
Nine lampposts will be added, aswell as racks to accommodate at least 50 bicycles. Everything but thenew trees should be in place early in the fall, Lazure promised.
For motorists, the number of lanes for vehicle traffic won't change, he said.
Theadditional sidewalk space will be taken almost entirely from drivers,however: "Each of the street's two vehicle lanes northbound will benarrowed," Lazure said, "from 4.2 metres across to 3.5 metres across."
Parkingspaces won't be made any slimmer, however. And six delivery zones willbe added to the current three, he said, to help reduce double-parkingby trucks.
The facelift favours walking and greater use of public transit and bicycles rather than cars, Lazure said.&nbsp;
		</blockquote>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/108.html</guid>
				<link>http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/108.html</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 6 May 2007 01:35:10]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ slavito]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>More Money From Ottawa for the Old Port</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Rejoice, Old Port residents - there's more transfers coming our way:

http://www.cyberpresse.ca/article/20070418/CPACTUALITES/704180623/1019/CPACTUALITES

<blockquote>
Mis à part le transfert de gouvernance, Ottawa fournira à la Société [du Vieux-Port] 94 millions sur cinq ans pour financer ses activités (18,8 millions par an) et 35 millions sur cinq ans (7 millions par an) pour entretenir ses infrastructures, notamment les fondations de certains quais. L'an dernier, elle avait obtenu 19 millions du fédéral. Elle aura donc pour cinq ans 6,8 millions de plus chaque année. La Société a d'autres sources de revenus qui lui rapportent plusieurs millions par an (événements, stationnements, etc.).
&nbsp;
		</blockquote>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/97.html</guid>
				<link>http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/97.html</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 2 May 2007 05:33:28]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ slavito]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The area west of McGill / Cité Multimédia</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ There's quite a bit of planning activity in this area (known as Griffintown East, aka Cité Multimédia aka Faubourg des Récollets) and included in the larger Havre area. All I can say is that the orange condo (M9) is only the beginning.

Anyway, check out the cool pics:

http://www.havremontreal.qc.ca/en/medias/images_rapport_final.html

or download the rendering from La Société du Havre (below)]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/91.html</guid>
				<link>http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/91.html</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 15 Apr 2007 04:54:19]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ krioq]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>&quot;Ébullition immobilière&quot; near Bell Center?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ http://www.ledevoir.com/2007/03/24/136551.html

<blockquote>
...
L'autre développement significatif porte sur un terrain de stationnement situé à l'angle des rues Peel et Saint-Antoine, au sud-ouest du centre-ville, un quartier en pleine ébullition immobilière. Selon des révélations faites cette semaine par le journal Les Affaires, Alain Gauthier, vice-président aux opérations du Centre Bell, a payé plus de 21 millions pour acquérir ce lot.

Le prix excessif (240 $ le pied carré plutôt que les 140 $ attendus dans ce secteur) laisse présager un développement rapide d'un projet devant générer des revenus considérables. Les hypothèses pointent vers la construction d'une salle d'environ 5000 places, un créneau inexistant à Montréal. La ville compte plusieurs salles de moins de 3000 places, le Centre Bell sert aux spectacles comptant plus de 20 000 billets par représentation, mais rien ne se trouve dans la jauge intermédiaire.
&nbsp;
		</blockquote>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/85.html</guid>
				<link>http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/85.html</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 24 Mar 2007 14:04:44]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ slavito]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Parc / des Pins Intersection</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ John of MidnightPoutine recently posted his musings on the subject of the new intersection of Ave du Parc & des Pins:

http://www.midnightpoutine.ca/montreal/2006/11/memories_of_an_ugly_intersection/

I have to say that I basically agree with him. It does look better, but... something is still missing. People, to be sure. Just like drivers still haven't learned anything about the new traffic lights, pedestrians still seem to consider this to be a "can't walk there" zone....  May be a bike track would help to encourage the circulation of people across (admittedly more accessible) lanes.

Post your ideas and suggestions, if you have any. Not that anyone would do anything about them, but it would be nice to diagnose the problem. 

]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/4.html</guid>
				<link>http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/4.html</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:12:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ slavito]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Who Will Develop Le Quartier des Spectacles?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ In case you don't know, Le Quartier des Spectacles is the area around St-Laurent & St-Catherine which is currently better known as le quartier des hookers.

Well, anyway, the new name is "Le Quartier des Spectacles" and apparently it's causing some squabbling in the city administration. Frankly, too complicated for me to follow - may be it's make more sense to you....

L'empressement du maire de Ville-Marie dérange
http://www.cyberpresse.ca/article/20070319/CPACTUALITES/703190492/5155/CPACTUALITES

]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/83.html</guid>
				<link>http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/83.html</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:05:00]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ slavito]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Huge Construction Opposite Bibliothèque Nationale</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I don't know if you were wondering what's going on along rue Berry, right next to the bus terminal and exactly across the street from La Grande Bibliothèque... I certainly was...

Well, anyway, it's part of sprawling UQAM empire.

http://www.immobilier.uqam.ca/pages/projetsDev.php

Here's some critical opinion about this and other projects in Montreal

http://coolopolis.blogspot.com/2007_01_01_archive.html



]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/82.html</guid>
				<link>http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/82.html</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 19 Mar 2007 02:33:01]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ slavito]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Rue McGill is almost fixed!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Barely two years after the start of major reconstruction, rue McGill is <i>almost</i> ready.

A few days ago it became navigable again and I saw road crews putting markings for ... get this... a bike lane! 

So pretty soon, the biking-friendly streets of MTL will count Rue McGill among them...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/14.html</guid>
				<link>http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/14.html</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:21:53]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ slavito]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>New Hotels next to Palais des Congres</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ (sorry about the absense of accents, I am using a PC right now)

I remember somebody was asking me what was all the noise and commotion on the corner of de Bleury and St-Antoine Ouest. I can confirm that it's going to be a hotel - if I am not mistaken, Westin.

Another hotel (Le Dauphin) is almost finished 2 blocks up, just north of Palais des Congres. 

https://hoteldauphin.merchantsecure.com/dauphinmontreal/introfranc.html
]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/8.html</guid>
				<link>http://www.montrealbits.com/dmb/posts/list/8.html</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:25:16]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ slavito]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>